Skip to main content

Permanganates for ISCO Remediation

 ISCOTaking Another Look at Permanganates for ISCO Remediation

In Situ Chemical Oxidation (ISCO) is a widely used remediation technique for cleaning up contaminated groundwater and soil. This process involves introducing oxidizing agents directly into the subsurface to break down organic contaminants. Two commonly used ISCO oxidants are potassium permanganate (KMnO₄) and sodium permanganate (NaMnO₄). While both oxidize a wide range of contaminants effectively, they have key differences that may influence their suitability for specific remediation projects.

Potassium permanganate (KMnO₄) and sodium permanganate (NaMnO₄) are both strong inorganic oxidizing agents. When dissolved in water, they produce permanganate ions (MnO₄⁻), which drive the chemical reactions that break down harmful contaminants. Potassium permanganate is commercially available as a crystalline solid, while sodium permanganate is available as a liquid solution—both containing permanganate as the active ingredient.

The choice between potassium permanganate and sodium permanganate depends on various factors such as the specific contaminants being treated, project design considerations, and handling preferences.

Potassium Permanganate
 

Advantages:

  • Safer to handle and apply
  • Lower costs compared to sodium permanganate
  • Available for custom blending in 1-5% solutions delivered directly to a project site in totes or bulk tankers
  • Can be used at 6% concentration when heated above 65 degrees in proper conditions

Disadvantages:

  • Listed on DHS's Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) program
  • Limited to maximum 5% solution concentration under normal circumstances
 
Sodium Permanganate
 

Advantages:

  • Provides a ready-to-use liquid product
  • Available in concentrations up to 40%
  • Avoids DHS CFATS restrictions
  

Disadvantages:

  • Higher material costs compared to potassium permanganate
  • Potential sodium issues in the environment (e.g., sodium adsorption ratio concerns)
  • Greater health and safety risks due to high oxidant concentration

 By carefully considering these factors, remediation professionals can select the most appropriate permanganate oxidant for their specific ISCO projects.

Comparing Performance for ISCO

Both potassium and sodium permanganate are versatile and effective oxidants for a wide range of common groundwater and soil contaminants, including:

  • Chlorinated solvents (e.g., PCE, TCE, DCE, VC)
  • Polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
  • 1,4-Dioxane
  • Phenolic compounds
  • Various other organic contaminants

When applied under comparable conditions, the oxidizing power, reactivity, and treatment mechanisms of potassium and sodium permanganate are similar. Key advantages of permanganate ISCO generally include:

  • Rapid contaminant degradation
  • Active over a wide pH range
  • Persistence in the subsurface
  • Easy to monitor and trace
  • No activation required
  • Approved for potable water treatment  

While higher concentrations of sodium permanganate may offer faster treatment, potassium permanganate can achieve similar results with proper application techniques. One advantage of lower potassium permanganate concentrations is the reduced heat generation during reactions with contaminants.

Considerations for Remediation Project Design

When selecting between potassium and sodium permanganate for an In Situ Chemical Oxidation (ISCO) project, several factors should be evaluated:

  • Contaminant type and concentration: The specific contaminants and their levels will influence the effectiveness of oxidation.
  • Co-contaminants: Other contaminants may interfere with the oxidation process.
  • Soil type: Fine-grained soils may require different delivery methods and retention times compared to coarse-grained soils.
  • Natural organic matter: This can impact the oxidation rate and efficiency.
  • Groundwater conditions: pH, alkalinity, and hardness can influence the oxidation reaction.
  • Logistics and site access: The availability of transportation, storage facilities, and site accessibility will affect the choice of oxidant.
  • Oxidant volume: The required amount of oxidant will depend on the site conditions and contaminant levels.
  • Regulatory requirements: Local regulations may influence the choice of oxidant and its application.
  • Long-term monitoring: Post-remediation monitoring needs will vary based on the project's goals and regulatory requirements.

Potassium permanganate may be preferred for smaller sites where container shipping and handling are easier. Sodium permanganate can be ideal for larger scale projects where bulk transportation and injection are more efficient, and on-site mixing can be minimized.

Safety and regulatory requirements should be carefully reviewed for both oxidants.

We offer both off-the-shelf permanganates and custom-blended solutions designed to meet the specific needs of your project, considering site conditions, logistics, and regulatory requirements.